Panthers - Skins trade(Denied)

SimsZilla · Posts: 118 Join date: 2007-09-08

skins get:
Mushin Muhhamad - 86 WR
Brandon Marshall - 80 WR

panthers get:
Jon Jansen - 90 RT

i agree. i guess

nieemo · Posts: 113 Join date: 2007-09-04

i agree

_________________

thanks zoooooooooooooom

Brianeal23 · Posts: 65 Join date: 2007-09-07

I like this trade, good or even decent WR's are hard to come by and a good OT is definately a fair trade for a veteran good WR and a young up and coming WR.

SimsZilla · Posts: 118 Join date: 2007-09-08

wait one sec.
nieemo can i have derrick mason instead of mushin muhhamad

SimsZilla · Posts: 118 Join date: 2007-09-08

mason is 85 and musin is 86. so ur getting a better deal

mksadng · Admin Posts: 156 Join date: 2007-09-04

This trade is unfair. WRs are hard to get and OT well arent hard to get...

poeticpyro · Subject: Re: Panthers - Skins trade(Denied) Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:23 pm

I think its fair, and I also think your logic is way off.

OL are a LOT harder to get then WRs. Go and count the number of lets say, 89+ WRs and the number of 89+ OLs.

Its a LOT harder to come by lineman then it is to come by WRs. Maybe not SPEEDY WRs, but WR in general are much easier to come by.

_________________

Oakland Raider

2007 Season

0 - 0

mksadng · Admin Posts: 156 Join date: 2007-09-04

poeticpyro wrote:

I think its fair, and I also think your logic is way off.

OL are a LOT harder to get then WRs. Go and count the number of lets say, 89+ WRs and the number of 89+ OLs.

Its a LOT harder to come by lineman then it is to come by WRs. Maybe not SPEEDY WRs, but WR in general are much easier to come by.

Yes but who go for more? WRs or OLs? WRs go for A LOT more then OL.

SimsZilla · Posts: 118 Join date: 2007-09-08

so does it get aprroved soon

lebronzoom · Admin Posts: 261 Join date: 2007-09-04

mksadng wrote:

poeticpyro wrote:

I think its fair, and I also think your logic is way off.

OL are a LOT harder to get then WRs. Go and count the number of lets say, 89+ WRs and the number of 89+ OLs.

Its a LOT harder to come by lineman then it is to come by WRs. Maybe not SPEEDY WRs, but WR in general are much easier to come by.

Yes but who go for more? WRs or OLs? WRs go for A LOT more then OL.

Moose is also like a million years old

mksadng · Admin Posts: 156 Join date: 2007-09-04

lebronzoom wrote:

mksadng wrote:

poeticpyro wrote:

I think its fair, and I also think your logic is way off.

OL are a LOT harder to get then WRs. Go and count the number of lets say, 89+ WRs and the number of 89+ OLs.

Its a LOT harder to come by lineman then it is to come by WRs. Maybe not SPEEDY WRs, but WR in general are much easier to come by.

Yes but who go for more? WRs or OLs? WRs go for A LOT more then OL.

Moose is also like a million years old

Jansons pretty old to and Marshall is a young WR, I vote no to this trade.

SoxNats07 · Posts: 157 Join date: 2007-09-04 Age: 16

mksadng wrote:

lebronzoom wrote:

mksadng wrote:

poeticpyro wrote:

I think its fair, and I also think your logic is way off.

OL are a LOT harder to get then WRs. Go and count the number of lets say, 89+ WRs and the number of 89+ OLs.

Its a LOT harder to come by lineman then it is to come by WRs. Maybe not SPEEDY WRs, but WR in general are much easier to come by.

Yes but who go for more? WRs or OLs? WRs go for A LOT more then OL.

Moose is also like a million years old

Jansons pretty old to and Marshall is a young WR, I vote no to this trade.

i agree completely with mksadng here, i am voting no.

silvablitz · Posts: 19 Join date: 2007-09-04

also a no on my side

mksadng · Admin Posts: 156 Join date: 2007-09-04

ok rework it guys.

titans0021 · Posts: 77 Join date: 2007-09-04

Wow you guys are getting really picky.

Muhammed is ancient and is only an 86 who will either retire at the end of the season or go down to like an 82.
Marshall is a young, decent WR who can get better but he is only 80 overall.

90+ OT's are tough to get in Madden and its not as though Jansen is really old.

This trade is almost right down the middle and to decline it is kind of sad.