lebronzoom
Admin
Posts : 261
Join date : 2007-09-03
 | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved)  Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:45 pm | |
| I actually think that the vikes are giving up more than the bengals are, I dont see why this trade shouldnt be approved | |
|
Dman
Posts : 112
Join date : 2007-09-06
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:46 pm | |
| y does everybody overate WR's | |
|
PatsTown
Admin
Posts : 400
Join date : 2007-08-13
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:46 pm | |
| Thankyou, I know I think the original was good enough but thats alright | |
|
PatsTown
Admin
Posts : 400
Join date : 2007-08-13
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:46 pm | |
| - Dman wrote:
- y does everybody overate WR's
no idea, I had to give up way more than I wanted to but oh well | |
|
lebronzoom
Admin
Posts : 261
Join date : 2007-09-03
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:47 pm | |
| I didnt say the original was good, I thought that one was off. But I think this second one is fine | |
|
Dman
Posts : 112
Join date : 2007-09-06
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:47 pm | |
| I'm just happy that I could get Kevin I need somebody on defence | |
|
PatsTown
Admin
Posts : 400
Join date : 2007-08-13
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:50 pm | |
| Alright, well Ill give this one a little wider processing range...Timed at 7:30 Any objections need to be said before then....that gives a solid 45 mins since this one had some contoversy(although unnecessary  ) | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Viks and Bengals(Approved) | |
| |
|
